H.Res. 1421

H.Res. 1421: Impeaching Sparkle L. Sooknanan, a Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Introduced Abraham Hamadeh (R) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1421 is a resolution that seeks to impeach Sparkle L. Sooknanan, a judge serving on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The resolution charges the judge with committing 'high crimes and misdemeanors,' which is a constitutional standard for impeachment proceedings against federal officials.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have highlighted the resolution as a necessary step to uphold judicial accountability and integrity in the federal court system. Supporters argue that impeaching judges who may have acted unethically is crucial for maintaining public trust in the judiciary.

Negative Media Summary

Critics in the media have condemned the resolution as a politically motivated attack on the judiciary, suggesting it undermines the independence of the courts. They argue that such actions could set a dangerous precedent and lead to the politicization of the impeachment process.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The analysis of H.Res. 1421, which seeks to impeach Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Abraham Hamadeh's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. The lobbying activity associated with this bill's policy area includes contributions from various entities, such as the American Concrete Institute and Anne Pramaggiore, totaling $140,000. However, these contributions do not directly relate to judicial matters or impeachment proceedings. The absence of overlapping interests suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest arising from financial influences on the sponsor's decision-making regarding this impeachment resolution. Voters should be aware that while significant lobbying dollars are present, they do not pertain to the judicial context of this bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $80,000
ANNE PRAMAGGIORE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $60,000
SIGHTLINE INTELLIGENCE C2 STRATEGIES $50,000
ACTUS ADVANCED SYSTEMS C2 STRATEGIES $40,000
WASHOE COUNTY PORTER GROUP, LLC $30,000
VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS, INC. C2 STRATEGIES $30,000
EO SOLUTIONS LLC PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
WASHOE COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
ULINE BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES $20,000
RTC SOUTHERN NEVADA PORTER GROUP, LLC $10,000
WISH BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN STATE CRANBERRY GROWERS ASSOCIATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WD SCHORSCH LLC BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Abraham Hamadeh, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us