S. 2403

S. 2403: Retire through Ownership Act

Passed Both Chambers Roger Marshall (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Retire through Ownership Act allows the fiduciary of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) to use valuations from independent experts to determine the fair market value of non-publicly traded company securities. This is particularly relevant for ESOPs, which are retirement plans where employees earn shares of their employer's stock. The bill requires that the valuation methods comply with specific IRS guidelines to ensure accuracy.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the Retire through Ownership Act have praised it for providing clarity and flexibility in the valuation process for ESOPs. They argue that it will help protect employees' retirement savings by ensuring that valuations are conducted by qualified professionals, potentially leading to fairer payouts when employees retire or leave their jobs.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the Retire through Ownership Act express concerns that relying on independent appraisers could lead to inconsistencies in stock valuations, potentially harming employees' financial interests. Some worry that the bill may inadvertently create loopholes that could be exploited by companies, undermining the original intent of ESOPs to provide fair compensation for employees' retirement.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$472,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The Retire through Ownership Act does not show any direct industry overlaps with the top donor industries of Senator Roger Marshall. His largest donors come from the health professionals sector, contributing $360 million, and the retired sector, contributing $112.5 million. Since the bill's subject matter does not directly relate to these industries, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. The absence of PAC contributions further indicates that the financial support is primarily from individual donors, which may lessen the risk of undue influence. Voters should be aware that while the financial backing is substantial, it does not correlate with the legislative agenda of the bill in question, suggesting that the motivations behind the sponsorship may not be financially driven by donor interests.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Roger Marshall, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $360,000,000
Individuals: $360,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $112,500,000
Individuals: $112,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us
Congressional Votes
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
House · Sep 16, 2026
Passed
401
YEA
14
NAY
18
NOT VOTING

Source: GovTrack.us roll call vote data.