S. 3500

S. 3500: Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act

Reported by Committee Catherine Cortez Masto (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act aims to improve the transparency and efficiency of the hydropower licensing process in the United States. It likely includes measures to streamline the application process for hydropower projects, enhance public access to information regarding licensing decisions, and promote stakeholder engagement in the licensing process.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act have praised it for potentially accelerating the development of renewable energy sources. They argue that by making the licensing process more transparent and efficient, the bill could lead to increased investment in hydropower, which is a key component of the nation's clean energy goals.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act have raised concerns that the bill may undermine environmental protections by speeding up the licensing process without adequate oversight. Some environmental groups fear that increased hydropower development could lead to negative impacts on local ecosystems and water quality.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Energy

The Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act, sponsored by Catherine Cortez Masto, does not show any direct industry overlaps with her top donor industries, which suggests a lower likelihood of conflicts of interest. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes contributions from various organizations, such as the SAFE ALLIANCE and CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, which contributed $30,000 and $40,000 respectively. However, these contributions do not directly correlate with the industries that typically influence hydropower legislation, indicating that the financial interests of her donors are not aligned with the bill's subject matter. Voters should note that while there are significant contributions from lobbyists, the absence of direct industry overlaps reduces the potential for conflicts.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CAPE BALLARD PARTNERS $120,000
NATIONAL ANIMAL SUPPLEMENT COUNCIL NATIONAL ANIMAL SUPPLEMENT COUNCIL $90,000
CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC $40,000
SAFE ALLIANCE ADVANCED ENERGY ADVISORS $30,000
CLAIRITY, INC. POLSINELLI PC $30,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION DOUBLE HAUL STRATEGIES LLC $9,000
COMMUNITY BANK ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC COMMUNITY BANK ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC undisclosed
FERRETLY INTERNATIONAL, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
PDE ACTION PDE ACTION undisclosed
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY FORDHAM UNIVERSITY undisclosed
XTREME CONCEPTS ROSS TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
SILICON RANCH ROSS TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
WELLS FARGO HAAS STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
ORGANOVO HOLDINGS, INC. FKA: ORGANOVO, INC. POLSINELLI PC undisclosed
BREAS MEDICAL POLSINELLI PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us