S. 3635

S. 3635: Fort Peck Water System Reauthorization Act

Reported by Committee Steve Daines (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Fort Peck Water System Reauthorization Act (S. 3635) is a bill introduced in the U.S. Senate on January 14, 2026, by Senator Steve Daines of Montana, with Senator Tim Sheehy as a co-sponsor. The bill aims to extend the authorization of the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000 by two years, changing the expiration date from 2026 to 2028. This extension allows the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System, which provides safe and adequate water supplies to the Fort Peck Indian Reservation and surrounding rural areas in northeastern Montana, to continue operating without interruption. The bill does not introduce new funding or alter the project's scope; it simply ensures the existing system can continue its operations for an additional two years.

At a Glance

S. 3635 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Steve Daines (Republican) and is currently listed as “Reported by Committee”. It is classified under the Water Resources Development policy area, one of 43 bills in that area we track this Congress.

Steve Daines is the sponsor of 18 bills in our database this Congress, so S. 3635 is part of a broader legislative agenda rather than a one-off proposal.

Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates S. 3635 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Water Resources Development is 2/10.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the bill's role in ensuring continued access to clean water for the Fort Peck Indian Reservation and nearby rural communities. The extension is seen as a necessary step to maintain the water system's operations, which are vital for the health and well-being of the residents. The bill's straightforward approach, focusing solely on extending the authorization period without introducing new funding or changes, has been noted as a pragmatic measure to prevent service disruptions.

Negative Media Summary

Critics have pointed out that while the bill extends the authorization period, it does not address underlying issues such as the need for infrastructure improvements or increased funding to enhance the water system's capacity and reliability. Some media outlets have expressed concern that merely extending the authorization without additional support may not be sufficient to meet the growing needs of the communities served by the Fort Peck Water System.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Water Resources Development

The analysis of Bill S. 3635, the Fort Peck Water System Reauthorization Act, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Senator Steve Daines, and his top donor industries. This indicates a low likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from financial contributions related to the bill's subject matter. The absence of overlapping interests suggests that the legislation is unlikely to be influenced by the financial interests of Daines' donors. Voters should be aware that while campaign contributions can sometimes create perceived conflicts, in this case, the lack of direct connections minimizes potential concerns.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us
Frequently Asked Questions
What does S. 3635 do?

The Fort Peck Water System Reauthorization Act (S. 3635) is a bill introduced in the U.S. Senate on January 14, 2026, by Senator Steve Daines of Montana, with Senator Tim Sheehy as a co-sponsor. The bill aims to extend the authorization of the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000 by two years, changing the expiration date from 2026 to 2028. This extension allows the Fort Peck…

Has S. 3635 received a floor vote?

No roll-call vote on S. 3635 is recorded in our database yet. Its current status is “Reported by Committee”.

Does S. 3635 have a conflict of interest?

Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates S. 3635 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Water Resources Development is 2/10. This score reflects overlap between the sponsor’s campaign funding, lobbying activity, and the industries the bill affects. It is a transparency indicator, not an accusation.

What is the status of S. 3635?

S. 3635 is currently “Reported by Committee” as of our last update on July 31, 2026.

Who sponsored S. 3635?

S. 3635 was sponsored by Steve Daines (Republican).