S. 4387

S. 4387: A bill to study the extent to which individuals are more at risk of maternal morbidity or mortality as a result of being a victim of intimate partner violence.

Introduced Jeanne Shaheen (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The bill S. 4387 aims to conduct a study to understand how being a victim of intimate partner violence may increase the risk of maternal morbidity or mortality. This suggests that the bill is focused on gathering data to potentially inform future policy or healthcare interventions to protect maternal health, particularly among those who have experienced intimate partner violence.

Positive Media Summary

Positive media coverage of the bill highlights its focus on an important and often overlooked issue: the intersection of intimate partner violence and maternal health risks. Advocates and healthcare professionals commend the bill for addressing a critical gap in research, which could lead to better-informed policies and protective measures for vulnerable populations.

Negative Media Summary

Negative media perspectives might argue that the bill could be seen as an unnecessary allocation of resources towards a study rather than direct action or support for victims of intimate partner violence. Critics may also express concern that the bill does not provide immediate solutions or funding for existing maternal health programs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

Based on the available data, there appears to be a low risk of conflict of interest between Senator Jeanne Shaheen's donors and the subject matter of bill S. 4387. The bill is focused on studying the impact of intimate partner violence on maternal morbidity and mortality. The sponsor's top donor industries do not directly overlap with the bill's subject matter. However, there has been lobbying activity in this bill's policy area. Notably, OSF Healthcare System has spent $60,000 and Capitol Counsel, LLC on behalf of Planned Parenthood for America has also been active, though the amount is undisclosed. While these organizations may have an interest in the bill's subject matter, there is no direct financial connection to the bill's sponsor that would suggest a conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM $60,000
COVISTA FKA ADTALEM GLOBAL EDUCATION, INC. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $40,000
NATIONAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $30,000
GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR ASSOCIATION 56 CAPITALS LLC $20,000
GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR ASSOCIATION GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR ASSOCIATION $20,000
SABINE NECHES KENT CAPERTON CONSULTING $15,000
SCHWAN'S COMPANY PEARSON WILCOX ADVOCACY $10,000
CAPITOL COUNSEL, LLC ON BEHALF OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOR AMERICA MICHAEL R. PAWLOWSKI undisclosed
TRANSGAS KING STREET SOLUTIONS undisclosed
COUNTY OF MERCED HB STRATEGIES undisclosed
EXELIXIS, INC. W STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
BSYD CORPORATION RYBERG AND SMITH, L.L.C. undisclosed
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed
THE DIGITAL CHAMBER (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHAMBER OF DIGITAL COMMERCE) LIQUID ADVISORS, INC. undisclosed
COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION CASCADE PUBLIC AFFAIRS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jeanne Shaheen, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $2,147,483,647
Individuals: $2,147,483,647 PACs: $0
Retired $750,000,000
Individuals: $750,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us