S. 4410

S. 4410: A bill to amend the Mineral Leasing Act to provide for the payment of bonus payments of certain coal leases issued under that Act.

Introduced John Barrasso (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The bill S. 4410 proposes amendments to the Mineral Leasing Act, specifically focusing on the financial aspects of coal leases. It aims to address the payment structures for bonus payments associated with certain coal leases. These bonus payments are typically upfront payments made by companies to secure the rights to extract coal from public lands.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the bill may highlight that it provides clarity and potentially more favorable financial terms for companies involved in coal extraction, thereby encouraging investment and maintaining coal industry jobs. It could be viewed as a measure to ensure that the leasing process is competitive and financially beneficial for both the government and the coal industry.

Negative Media Summary

Critics might argue that the bill further entrenches reliance on coal at a time when there is a push for cleaner energy sources. There may be concerns about the environmental impact of promoting coal leases and the potential loss of revenue if bonus payments are structured in a way that favors coal companies over public interest. Additionally, there could be criticism regarding the lack of focus on transitioning to renewable energy sources.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Energy

The analysis of bill S. 4410, which amends the Mineral Leasing Act regarding coal leases, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, John Barrasso, and his top donor industries. This indicates a low risk of conflict of interest directly related to the bill's subject matter. Notably, the lobbying activity associated with the bill includes various entities, but none appear to have a direct financial stake in coal leasing or mineral rights, which is the focus of the bill. The only disclosed financial contribution is from SANA HEALTH, amounting to $7,500, which does not relate to the mineral leasing industry. Therefore, the potential for conflicts arising from donor influence on this legislation is minimal.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SANA HEALTH TERRAPIN STRATEGY, INC $7,500
VICTIMS OF TERRORISM - EAST AFRICA MR. RONALD COLEMAN undisclosed
VENUS AEROSPACE CORP. VENUS AEROSPACE CORP. undisclosed
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY THE CORMAC GROUP, LLC undisclosed
SOIL CULTURE SOLUTIONS, LLC (D/B/A SOILCEA) CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE undisclosed
NEBRASKA RURAL GENERATION LLC JABAL COMPANIES LLC undisclosed
RHOBACK, INC. ATLAS CROSSING LLC undisclosed
GLOBAL MOBILE SOFTWARE LLC TERRAPIN STRATEGY, INC undisclosed
SUMAIR VIRANI COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
NATIONAL STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS TRADE ASSOCIATION COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
NUMERACLE, INC. ACG ADVOCACY undisclosed
AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR CAPITAL FORMATION undisclosed
HUBBARD HOUSE RESTAURANT, LLC COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed
INTUIT INC., AND ITS ENTERPRISE MEMBERS COZEN O'CONNOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding John Barrasso, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $1,960,000,000
Individuals: $1,960,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $612,500,000
Individuals: $612,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us