S. 4464

S. 4464: A bill to amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products Inspection Act to ensure that consumers can make informed decisions in choosing between meat and poultry products and cell-cultivated protein products, and for other purpos

Introduced Pete Ricketts (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4464 aims to amend existing laws related to meat and poultry inspection to provide consumers with clearer information about their choices between traditional meat and poultry products and cell-cultivated protein products. The bill is likely intended to enhance labeling requirements so that consumers can make informed decisions regarding their food options.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4464 have praised the bill for promoting transparency in the food industry. They argue that clear labeling will empower consumers to make informed choices, potentially leading to healthier dietary options and increased acceptance of innovative food technologies like cell-cultivated proteins.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4464 have expressed concerns that the bill may create unnecessary regulatory burdens on traditional meat and poultry producers. Some argue that the focus on cell-cultivated proteins could undermine the market for conventional meat products, leading to economic challenges for farmers and producers.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

Based on the available data, there appears to be no direct conflict of interest between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. The bill is primarily concerned with the meat and poultry industry, and none of the sponsor's top donors are directly linked to this industry. The lobbying activity related to this bill's policy area is diverse, with a range of industries and organizations represented. However, none of these entities appear to have a direct stake in the meat and poultry industry. Furthermore, the disclosed dollar amounts from these entities are relatively low, with the highest being $25,000 from the American Association for Justice. This suggests that the potential for undue influence from these entities is relatively low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. CLARK STREET ASSOCIATES $30,000
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE LXR GROUP $25,000
BMWED/BRS/SMART-MD/PASSENGER RAIL/NCFOBJ MOONEY, GREEN, SAINDON, MURPHY & WELCH, P.C. $16,000
YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION INITIATIVE MICHAEL POWELSON $11,000
HEALTHY MARKETS ASSOCIATION LXR GROUP $10,000
UNIAO DA INDUSTRIA DE CANA-DE-AUCAR E BIOENERGIA (UNICA) BARRAL M JORGE CONSULTORES ASSOCIADOS LTDA $10,000
CONFEDERACAO NACIONAL DAS INSTITUICOES FINANCEIRAS BARRAL M JORGE CONSULTORES ASSOCIADOS LTDA $10,000
NATL ASSC OF STATE DIRECTORS OF CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION NATL ASSC OF STATE DIRECTORS OF CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION undisclosed
BRAZILIAN AVOCADO COMMISSION FEDERAL STRATEGIES GROUP, INC. undisclosed
SAAGA FEDERAL STRATEGIES GROUP, INC. undisclosed
UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO undisclosed
THE GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, INC. KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC undisclosed
CLOUDTRUCKS INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
LOS ANGELES CLEANTECH INCUBATOR INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
THE SCIENCE COALITION FORBES-TATE undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Pete Ricketts, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us