S. 4574

S. 4574: A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, regarding restrictions on the use of funds and facilities of the Department of Defense for abortion care.

Introduced Kirsten Gillibrand (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4574 is a bill that seeks to amend Title 10 of the United States Code to change the rules regarding how the Department of Defense can use its funds and facilities in relation to abortion care. This may involve either lifting or imposing restrictions on funding for abortion services provided to military personnel and their dependents.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised S. 4574 as a necessary step to ensure that service members have access to comprehensive reproductive health care, including abortion services, which they argue is essential for the well-being and autonomy of military personnel.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4574 have expressed concern that the bill could lead to the use of taxpayer dollars for abortion services, which they oppose on moral or ethical grounds. Some media coverage has framed the bill as part of a broader agenda that could undermine traditional values and the sanctity of life.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill regarding abortion care, the lobbying activity in this policy area raises some concerns. Notably, the National Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. has contributed $600,000, which could suggest an interest in influencing legislation related to government spending and contracts. However, the lack of direct financial ties to abortion care specifically mitigates the risk of a significant conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while the financial connections are not overtly related to the bill, the presence of substantial lobbying efforts could indicate underlying influences that may not be immediately apparent.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. $600,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
ENVISION GROUP LLC MR. ANDREW FUTEY undisclosed
GESCONTI GROUP,INC. GESCONTI GROUP,INC. undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN LOGISTICS ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
TRACKONOMY SYSTEMS, INC. ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
HOLLY STRATEGIES INC. ON BEHALF OF 202 GROUP ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
CITY OF ST LOUIS BRACY TUCKER BROWN & VALANZANO DBA BROWN & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
EMAD EL SAID YOUSSEF SAAD EL-GALADA THROUGH BOLT CAPITAL, LP NEXUSONE CONSULTING undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Kirsten Gillibrand, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $2,147,483,647
Individuals: $2,147,483,647 PACs: $0
Retired $750,000,000
Individuals: $750,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us