S. 4784 is a bill that seeks to authorize funding for the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy for the fiscal year 2027. It includes provisions for military activities, military construction projects, and establishes personnel strength levels for the military.
S. 4784 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Roger Wicker (Republican) and is currently listed as “prov_kill_cloturefailed”. It is classified under the Economics and Public Finance policy area, one of 42 bills in that area we track this Congress.
Roger Wicker is the sponsor of 11 bills in our database this Congress, so S. 4784 is part of a broader legislative agenda rather than a one-off proposal.
The most significant recorded vote (Senate, July 14, 2026) ended 50–46.
Senate lobbying disclosures list 15 organizations lobbying on this bill’s issue area.
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates S. 4784 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Economics and Public Finance is 3.1/10.
Supporters of S. 4784 emphasize the importance of maintaining a strong national defense and ensuring that the military is adequately funded to meet current and future challenges. They argue that the bill reflects a commitment to national security and supports military families through construction projects and personnel management.
Critics of S. 4784 raise concerns about the rising military budget and argue that it diverts funds from critical domestic programs such as healthcare and education. Some express skepticism about the necessity of the proposed military expenditures, questioning whether they align with current geopolitical realities.
The analysis of bill S. 4784, which focuses on military appropriations, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Roger Wicker's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. The top donor industries for Wicker do not include defense or military-related sectors, which suggests a lower risk of conflicts of interest. The lobbying activities related to this bill primarily involve undisclosed amounts from various entities, including some with significant contributions like Fresenius Kabi USA LLC at $1,100,000. However, these entities do not appear to have a direct connection to military funding or activities, further mitigating potential conflicts.
Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.
| Client | Lobbying Firm | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| FRESENIUS KABI USA LLC | FRESENIUS KABI USA LLC | $1,100,000 |
| CONSEJO COORDINADOR EMPRESARIAL | IQOM STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC | $140,000 |
| IVANHOE ATLANTIC (FORMERLY HIGH POWER EXPLORATION INC.) | YORKTOWN SOLUTIONS | $120,000 |
| SKYRYSE, INC. | SKYRYSE, INC. | $70,000 |
| AIS HEALTHCARE | MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) | $20,000 |
| THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF WEST COUNTY WASTEWATER DISTRICT, CA | EARL STOCKDALE | undisclosed |
| THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC FOR CITY OF OCEANSIDE CA | EARL STOCKDALE | undisclosed |
| THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF WARD & SMITH (FOR BALD HEAD ISLAND) | EARL STOCKDALE | undisclosed |
| THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF WARD & SMITH, PA (FOR HOLDEN BEACH, NC) | EARL STOCKDALE | undisclosed |
| CORE POWER (US) INC. | INVARIANT LLC | undisclosed |
| ICON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | INVARIANT LLC | undisclosed |
| HUBBS-SEAWORLD RESEARCH INSTITUTE | HAMMER ASSOCIATES, LLC | undisclosed |
| THE POLICY SHOP LLC | JAVELIN ADVISORS LLC | undisclosed |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF HEALTHCARE PURCHASER COALITIONS | NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF HEALTHCARE PURCHASER COALITIONS | undisclosed |
| EARTHSHIP CORPORATION | RED DOOR CONSULTING, LLC | undisclosed |
Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026
Top industries funding Roger Wicker, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
Source: GovTrack.us roll call vote data.
What does S. 4784 do?
S. 4784 is a bill that seeks to authorize funding for the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy for the fiscal year 2027. It includes provisions for military activities, military construction projects, and establishes personnel strength levels for the military.
How did Congress vote on S. 4784?
The most significant recorded vote (Senate, July 14, 2026) ended 50–46.
Does S. 4784 have a conflict of interest?
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates S. 4784 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Economics and Public Finance is 3.1/10. This score reflects overlap between the sponsor’s campaign funding, lobbying activity, and the industries the bill affects. It is a transparency indicator, not an accusation.
What is the status of S. 4784?
S. 4784 is currently “prov_kill_cloturefailed” as of our last update on July 16, 2026.
Who sponsored S. 4784?
S. 4784 was sponsored by Roger Wicker (Republican).
