S. 4990

S. 4990: A bill to require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to review and update Federal Aviation Administration regulations, policies, and guidance related to low-altitude airspace safety, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jeff Merkley (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4990 is a bill that mandates the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to review and update its regulations, policies, and guidance concerning safety in low-altitude airspace. This may involve assessing current safety measures and making improvements to ensure safer operations for aircraft flying at lower altitudes.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4990 have praised the bill for its proactive approach to enhancing air safety, particularly in increasingly congested low-altitude airspace. Advocates argue that updating regulations is essential to accommodate new aviation technologies and growing drone usage, which could lead to improved safety for both manned and unmanned aircraft.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4990 have expressed concerns that the bill may lead to unnecessary regulatory burdens on small aviation operators and could slow down innovation in the aviation sector. Some fear that an extensive review process might delay the implementation of new technologies that could enhance safety and efficiency in low-altitude operations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of bill S. 4990, which focuses on low-altitude airspace safety, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Jeff Merkley's top donor industries. The lobbying activity related to this bill primarily involves organizations such as Healthequity, Inc. and Mathematica, Inc., which have contributed $50,000 and $60,000 respectively. However, these entities do not appear to have a direct stake in aviation safety regulations. The lack of direct financial ties between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's donors suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists in this area, it does not seem to influence the bill's intent or the sponsor's motivations significantly.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $70,000
MATHEMATICA, INC TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $60,000
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM $60,000
ACTUM ON BEHALF OF HEALTHEQUITY, INC. TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $50,000
COALITION FOR THE USE OF SAFE AND EFFICIENT REFRIGERANTS WILLIAMSON LAW + POLICY PLLC $20,000
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP $10,000
NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION $5,000
ASSOCIATION FOR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND PERFORMANCE (AMPP) ASSOCIATION FOR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND PERFORMANCE (AMPP) undisclosed
SYSTEMS & METHODS, INC. CAPROCK STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
HEALING LODGE OF THE SEVEN NATIONS HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
TIGERSWAN ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
LWRC INTERNATIONAL, LLC ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIVE VILLAGE OF EYAK HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jeff Merkley, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us