S.Res. 762

S.Res. 762: A resolution supporting the designation of the second Friday in June as “National Service and Conservation Corps Day”.

Introduced Martin Heinrich (D) SENATE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S.Res. 762 is a resolution that supports the establishment of the second Friday in June as 'National Service and Conservation Corps Day.' This day is intended to honor and recognize the contributions of service and conservation corps across the country, which engage young people in community service and environmental conservation efforts.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the importance of recognizing the contributions of service and conservation corps, emphasizing their role in fostering civic engagement and environmental stewardship. Supporters argue that this designation will help raise awareness of the positive impact these organizations have on communities and inspire more young people to get involved.

Negative Media Summary

Some critics have questioned the necessity of a designated day for service and conservation corps, arguing that it may divert attention and resources from more pressing environmental and social issues. Others believe that existing observances already sufficiently honor volunteerism and conservation efforts, making this resolution redundant.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$1,050,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The bill S.Res. 762, which supports the designation of National Service and Conservation Corps Day, does not show any direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Martin Heinrich's top donor industries, which are primarily Health Professionals and Retired individuals. The total contributions from these sectors amount to $1,050,000,000, but they do not directly relate to the conservation or service sectors that the bill addresses. The lobbying activity in this policy area does not indicate significant financial influence from industries that could create a conflict of interest concerning the bill's subject matter. The lobbying amounts, while notable, are not linked to the sponsor's primary donors, suggesting minimal risk of conflict. Voters should be aware that while there is lobbying activity in related areas, it does not appear to intersect with Heinrich's financial backers, indicating a low risk of undue influence.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Martin Heinrich, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $800,000,000
Individuals: $800,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $250,000,000
Individuals: $250,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us