Consideration when determining child custody: human trafficking.

California Assembly Bill 1375 adds a new provision to the Family Code that requires courts to consider whether a parent or guardian has been involved in human trafficking when making child custody decisions. This aims to protect children from potential harm by ensuring that custody arrangements prioritize their safety and well-being. The bill reflects a growing awareness of the impact of human trafficking on families.

Supporters of AB 1375 would highlight it as a crucial step in safeguarding children from the dangers associated with human trafficking. By ensuring that custody decisions take into account a parent's involvement in trafficking, the bill aims to create a safer environment for children. Advocates believe this legislation empowers the courts to make more informed decisions that prioritize children's welfare.

Critics of AB 1375 may argue that the bill could lead to unintended consequences in custody disputes, potentially complicating cases where accusations of trafficking may not be substantiated. They might express concern that this legislation could unfairly stigmatize parents and complicate the custody process. Additionally, opponents could question whether the bill addresses the root causes of trafficking effectively or merely adds another layer to an already complex legal framework.