CA SB367

Mental health.

Failed Senate Benjamin Allen (D)
Plain English Summary

California Senate Bill 367 (SB 367), introduced in February 2025 by Senator Benjamin Allen and co-authored by Senators Henry Stern, Catherine Blakespear, and Susan Rubio, aimed to amend existing mental health laws, particularly the Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) Act. The bill proposed changes to sections 5150, 5150.4, 5352, 5352.6, 5354, and 5976.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, and sought to add Section 5975.4. These amendments were intended to refine the criteria and procedures for the involuntary commitment and treatment of individuals with specific mental health disorders, focusing on those deemed a danger to themselves or others, or who are gravely disabled. The bill underwent several amendments between March and May 2025 but ultimately failed to pass, being returned to the Secretary of the Senate on February 2, 2026, pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Supporters Say

While specific media coverage on SB 367 is not readily available, the bill's intent to refine the LPS Act suggests a proactive approach to improving mental health care in California. By proposing amendments to existing laws, the bill aimed to enhance the clarity and effectiveness of procedures for involuntary commitment and treatment, potentially leading to better outcomes for individuals with severe mental health disorders.

Critics Say

Without direct media reports, it's challenging to ascertain specific criticisms of SB 367. However, potential concerns could have included debates over civil liberties, the adequacy of proposed amendments in addressing systemic issues, or disagreements on the balance between individual rights and public safety in the context of involuntary commitment.

Legislative Votes
Placed on suspense file
Senate · May 12, 2025
Passed
7
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Senate · Apr 29, 2025
Passed
12
YEA
1
NAY
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]
Senate · Apr 9, 2025
Passed
11
YEA
0
NAY

Source: LegiScan roll call vote data.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the California State Legislature. Conflict-of-interest analysis for this bill is coming soon.