Mitigation

The bill requires the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation to submit an annual report detailing the number of applications filed under the Water Quality Control Act. It mandates that the report include information on compensatory mitigation mechanisms used in permits that require such mitigation. Specifically, it seeks additional details if the mitigation involves in-lieu fee programs or mitigation banking.

TN HB0613 is a house bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by Kevin Vaughan (R), currently “Introduced” since January 30, 2025.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 39 of them sponsored by Kevin Vaughan.

Supporters argue that this bill promotes transparency and accountability in environmental management by requiring detailed reporting on water quality permits. It ensures that compensatory mitigation efforts are properly documented and scrutinized, which can lead to better environmental outcomes and resource management.

Critics might say this bill adds unnecessary bureaucratic layers and reporting requirements that could slow down the permitting process. They may argue that it places additional burdens on the department and could divert resources away from more direct environmental protection efforts.

The sponsor of HB0613, Kevin Vaughan, has significant personal financial interests in the real estate industry, as evidenced by his roles as a real estate developer and owner of multiple real estate-related businesses. The bill pertains to water resources development and requires reporting on compensatory mitigation mechanisms under the Water Quality Control Act. While there is no direct overlap between real estate development and the specific regulatory focus of the bill, there is a potential indirect alignment. Real estate development projects often require permits that may involve compensatory mitigation, especially when impacting water resources. Therefore, changes in reporting requirements or mitigation mechanisms could indirectly affect the cost or feasibility of development projects, potentially benefiting Vaughan's interests in the real estate sector.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.