Recovery From Disasters And Emergencies

Tennessee HB1335 requires the Tennessee Emergency Management Agency (TEMA) to submit an annual report by February 1 each year. This report will detail the agency's recovery efforts from disasters in the previous year and offer recommendations for improving future recovery processes.

TN HB1335 is a house bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by William Lamberth (R), currently “Introduced” since February 6, 2025.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 258 of them sponsored by William Lamberth.

Supporters of HB1335 would highlight the bill as a proactive measure to ensure accountability and transparency in disaster recovery efforts. By mandating annual reports, the bill aims to improve the efficiency of recovery processes, ultimately benefiting communities affected by disasters.

Critics of HB1335 might argue that the bill places an additional bureaucratic burden on TEMA without guaranteeing significant improvements in disaster recovery. They may also express concerns that the focus on reporting could divert attention and resources away from immediate recovery needs in affected areas.

The analysis of HB1335, concerning emergency management and recovery efforts, reveals no direct conflicts of interest with Representative William Lamberth's personal financial interests. Lamberth's professional background as an attorney and his involvement with various boards and organizations do not intersect with the emergency management sector targeted by this bill. His legal practice and consulting business are not directly related to disaster recovery or emergency management, which are the primary focus areas of the legislation. Furthermore, his spouse's employment in education and his own roles in community and educational boards do not present any apparent financial gain from the bill's implementation.

The bill's requirement for TEMA to submit annual reports on recovery efforts is an administrative measure aimed at improving efficiency in emergency management, which does not align with Lamberth's professional or business interests. Given the lack of direct or indirect financial benefit to Lamberth from the bill, the risk of conflict of interest remains low. This conclusion is based on the current documentation of Lamberth's financial interests and professional engagements.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.