Acceptable Uses Of Technology Provided By Public Schools

Tennessee HB1886 requires local education agencies (LEAs) and public charter schools to create and implement a policy that outlines acceptable internet use for students. This policy aims to ensure that technology provided by schools is used safely and responsibly. The bill includes additional related provisions to enhance the management of technology in educational settings.

TN HB1886 is a house bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by Scott Cepicky (R), currently “Passed” since May 26, 2026.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 82 of them sponsored by Scott Cepicky.

Supporters of HB1886 would argue that this bill is a proactive step toward ensuring the safe and responsible use of technology in schools. By mandating internet acceptable use policies, it promotes a secure learning environment and helps protect students from online dangers. This legislation is seen as essential in adapting to the increasing reliance on technology in education.

Critics of HB1886 may contend that the bill places unnecessary restrictions on students and could limit their access to valuable online resources. They might argue that while internet safety is important, overly strict acceptable use policies could stifle creativity and learning opportunities. Additionally, there are concerns about the implementation and enforcement of these policies in diverse school environments.

The analysis of HB1886, which pertains to the acceptable use of technology in public schools, reveals no direct conflicts of interest with Representative Scott Cepicky's personal financial interests. As a real estate agent employed by Crye-Leike Realtors, his professional activities are centered around the real estate industry, which is unrelated to the education, internet, or data privacy sectors impacted by this bill. Additionally, there is no indication that his spouse's employment at First Bank presents any potential for financial gain from the proposed legislation. The bill's focus on internet use policies and compliance audits within educational institutions does not intersect with real estate or banking, minimizing any risk of conflict.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.