Restrictions On Land Purchases

Tennessee HB2547 changes the laws about who can buy land in Tennessee, specifically targeting restrictions on purchases made by certain foreign individuals or entities that are sanctioned. The bill aims to limit property ownership by these groups to protect local interests and security. It updates existing regulations to reflect these new restrictions.

TN HB2547 is a house bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by William Lamberth (R), currently “Passed” since April 29, 2026.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 258 of them sponsored by William Lamberth.

The key recorded vote (House, March 24, 2026) ended 20–2 and passed.

Supporters of TN HB2547 argue that the bill is crucial for safeguarding Tennessee's land from foreign influence and ensuring that property ownership remains in the hands of Americans. They believe it enhances national security and protects local communities from potential risks associated with foreign ownership.

Critics of TN HB2547 contend that the bill unfairly targets certain individuals based on their nationality, potentially leading to discrimination and limiting economic opportunities. They argue that such restrictions could harm Tennessee's economy by discouraging foreign investment and could be seen as xenophobic.

The analysis of HB2547, which concerns restrictions on land purchases by sanctioned aliens or foreign entities, reveals no direct overlaps between the sponsor William Lamberth's personal financial interests and the bill's subject matter. As an attorney and partner at a law firm, Lamberth's professional activities do not appear to intersect with the specific impacts of the legislation regarding land purchases. His roles as a business owner and board member in various organizations also do not suggest a financial stake in the real estate market or in transactions that would be influenced by this bill.

Furthermore, while Lamberth's legal background may provide him with insights into the implications of the bill, it does not indicate a personal financial gain from its enactment. The absence of any documented business interests in real estate or related fields further supports a low risk assessment. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal, as there are no evident financial incentives that would benefit him directly from the legislation's outcomes.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

Source: LegiScan roll call vote data.