A RESOLUTION to provide for a recess in the proceedings of the One Hundred Fourteenth General Assembly.

The bill, TN HJR0062, is a resolution that allows for a break in the sessions of the Tennessee General Assembly. Specifically, it schedules a recess for the House from January 27 to February 3, 2025, and for the Senate from January 27 to February 10, 2025. This means that the legislative activities will pause during this time.

TN HJR0062 is a house bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by William Lamberth (R), currently “Passed” since February 4, 2025.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 258 of them sponsored by William Lamberth.

Supporters of the bill argue that the recess will provide lawmakers with necessary time to regroup and prepare for the upcoming legislative challenges. They believe this break will enhance productivity and allow for more effective deliberation on important issues.

Critics might argue that scheduling a recess could lead to delays in addressing pressing legislative matters. They may express concern that this break could be seen as a lack of urgency in tackling the needs of constituents during a critical time.

William Lamberth, the sponsor of HJR0062, has several personal financial interests that could present potential conflicts with the bill's subject matter, which pertains to government operations. His employment with the State of Tennessee aligns with the bill's impact on government proceedings, as the recess directly affects the legislative schedule and operations of the General Assembly. This connection raises questions about whether his position could influence his actions regarding the timing of legislative sessions, potentially benefiting his role within the government.

Additionally, Lamberth's involvement as a board member of Volunteer State Community College may also present a conflict, as the recess could indirectly affect educational institutions and their operations during the legislative session. While the bill itself does not directly regulate educational policies, any changes in legislative timing could have downstream effects on funding or policy discussions that impact his board responsibilities. Thus, while the risk is not critical, there is a notable alignment between his interests and the bill's implications that warrants attention.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.