Sign Language Interpreters

The bill proposes to establish a Tennessee board dedicated to overseeing sign language interpreters. This board would be responsible for setting standards and regulations for sign language interpreting in the state. The goal is to improve the quality and accessibility of interpreting services for the deaf and hard of hearing communities.

TN SB0942 is a senate bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by Becky Massey (R), currently “Introduced” since February 5, 2025.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 184 of them sponsored by Becky Massey.

Supporters of the bill argue that creating a dedicated board for sign language interpreters will enhance the professionalism and quality of interpreting services in Tennessee. They believe this will lead to better communication access for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, ultimately fostering greater inclusion and equality in society.

Critics of the bill may argue that establishing a new board could lead to unnecessary bureaucracy and increased regulation that may hinder the availability of interpreters. They might also express concerns about the potential costs associated with implementing and maintaining the board, which could divert resources from other important services.

The bill SB0942 aims to create a Tennessee board of sign language interpreting, which primarily impacts the regulation and oversight of sign language interpreters within the health care sector. The sponsor, Becky Massey, serves as the Executive Director of Sertoma Center, an organization that may employ or utilize sign language interpreters. However, there is no direct evidence that the establishment of this board would provide a financial benefit to her or her organization. Additionally, her other personal financial interests, including various board memberships and investments, do not directly correlate with the specific outcomes of this bill. As such, while there is a tangential connection through her role in health-related services, it does not present a significant conflict of interest.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.