Commencement Of Proceedings

Tennessee SB1070 extends the time frame in which victims of child sexual abuse can pursue legal action. For criminal cases, the statute of limitations is increased from 25 years to 30 years after the victim turns 18. Similarly, for civil lawsuits related to child sexual abuse, the time limit is also extended from 15 years to 30 years after the victim's 18th birthday.

TN SB1070 is a senate bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by Jack Johnson (R), currently “Passed” since April 28, 2025.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 353 of them sponsored by Jack Johnson.

Supporters of SB1070 argue that this bill provides crucial additional time for victims of child sexual abuse to come forward and seek justice. By extending the statute of limitations, the legislation acknowledges the long-term impact of such trauma and empowers survivors to hold offenders accountable even years later.

Critics of SB1070 may express concerns that extending the statute of limitations could complicate legal proceedings and make it more difficult to defend against accusations made long after the alleged events. They might argue that this could lead to potential injustices for those accused of crimes that occurred decades ago.

The bill SB1070 aims to extend the statute of limitations for criminal and civil actions related to child sexual abuse. The sponsor, Jack Johnson, has a diverse range of personal financial interests, primarily in healthcare, real estate, and various investment funds. However, there are no direct overlaps between his personal financial interests and the specific impacts of this bill. Johnson's role as Vice President of Client Relations at CIGNA Healthcare does not directly relate to the legal implications or potential financial outcomes of extending the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse cases. Furthermore, his ownership of a small business consulting firm and interests in various investment funds do not present a conflict with the legislation's focus on child protection and legal proceedings. Overall, the lack of direct financial benefit from the bill's enactment indicates a low risk of conflict of interest.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.