Consumer Protection

The bill, TN SB2103, aims to update Tennessee's consumer protection laws by removing an outdated rule regarding the printing of credit or debit card information on receipts. Specifically, it eliminates a provision that staggered the effective date for prohibiting the printing of more than five digits of a card number or the expiration date on receipts from cash registers or other devices. This change is intended to streamline the regulations related to receipt printing.

TN SB2103 is a senate bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by Brent Taylor (R), currently “Introduced” since January 22, 2026.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 129 of them sponsored by Brent Taylor.

Supporters of TN SB2103 would argue that this bill simplifies and modernizes consumer protection laws, making it easier for businesses to comply with updated standards. By removing obsolete provisions, it helps ensure that consumers' sensitive information is better protected, while also reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens on merchants.

Critics of TN SB2103 may contend that the bill overlooks the importance of maintaining strict protections for consumer information. They might argue that removing any regulations related to receipt printing could lead to increased risks of identity theft and fraud, ultimately putting consumers at risk.

The bill SB2103 addresses consumer protection by amending provisions related to the printing of credit and debit card information on receipts. The sponsor, Brent Taylor, has personal financial interests primarily in the legal field through his occupation as an attorney and his affiliation with Taylor Law Firm. Additionally, he is involved with UBS Investments and has a role in funeral services. However, none of these interests directly align with the banking or consumer credit sectors impacted by this bill. There are no documented business interests or investments that would directly benefit from the changes proposed in SB2103, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.