Global Positioning Monitoring

Tennessee SB2665 requires courts to use global positioning monitoring for defendants accused of certain crimes when they are released. This monitoring will only be avoided if the court finds that the defendant does not pose a threat to the victim or public safety. Additionally, the courts must report annually on how many defendants are monitored under this law.

TN SB2665 is a senate bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by Raumesh Akbari (D), currently “Introduced” since February 2, 2026.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 237 of them sponsored by Raumesh Akbari.

Supporters of SB2665 argue that this bill enhances public safety by ensuring that individuals accused of serious offenses are monitored while awaiting trial. They believe it provides necessary protection for victims and the community, as it allows for closer oversight of potentially dangerous individuals.

Critics of SB2665 may contend that the bill imposes unnecessary restrictions on defendants, potentially infringing on their rights before a conviction. They might also argue that the requirement for global positioning monitoring could lead to increased costs and logistical challenges for the judicial system.

Senator Raumesh Akbari, as an attorney, has a direct professional interest in the legal implications of the bill SB2665, which mandates global positioning monitoring for certain defendants. This legislation could potentially lead to an increase in legal cases involving defendants who are subject to such monitoring, thereby increasing the demand for legal representation in these cases. Given that Akbari is self-employed at Akbari Law, this creates a scenario where the bill could financially benefit her law practice through increased clientele or case volume related to the enforcement of this law.

Furthermore, the bill's focus on crime and law enforcement intersects with the legal profession, where attorneys often represent clients in criminal cases. This alignment raises concerns about a conflict of interest, as Akbari's personal financial gain could be tied to the outcomes of the legislation she sponsors. While her other interests, such as board memberships and involvement in various organizations, do not directly relate to the bill, her primary occupation as an attorney presents a significant potential for conflict.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.