A RESOLUTION relative to the definition of antisemitism.

The bill establishes a clear definition of antisemitism for use by Tennessee state government departments and agencies. It aims to help these entities determine if discriminatory intent exists in laws or policies that prohibit discrimination based on race, color, religion, or national origin.

TN SJR0003 is a senate bill in the Tennessee 114th General Assembly, sponsored by Mark Pody (R), currently “Engrossed” since March 27, 2025.

We track 9,160 Tennessee bills this session, 182 of them sponsored by Mark Pody.

Supporters of the bill would argue that it provides a necessary framework to combat antisemitism and ensures that state policies are aligned with a clear understanding of what constitutes discrimination against Jewish individuals. They would emphasize the importance of protecting all citizens from hate and discrimination.

Critics might contend that the bill could lead to the misuse of the definition of antisemitism to stifle free speech or criticism of Israel. They may argue that it complicates the legal landscape around discrimination and could inadvertently limit discussions on important social issues.

The bill SJR0003 establishes a definition of antisemitism and encourages state departments to use this definition in determining discriminatory intent in laws or policies. Upon analyzing the personal financial interests of the sponsor, Mark Pody, there are no direct overlaps between his interests and the bill's subject matter. His primary occupation as an insurance agent and ownership of Pody & Associates do not directly relate to civil rights or the definition of antisemitism. Furthermore, his involvement in real estate and various estate executor roles does not present a conflict with the bill's focus on discrimination based on race, color, religion, or national origin.

Given that the bill does not pertain to any industry in which Pody has a vested financial interest, the risk of a conflict of interest is low. The absence of any relevant personal interests that could benefit from the legislation indicates that there is minimal potential for personal financial gain influencing the legislative process.

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.