H.J.Res. 174

H.J.Res. 174: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide for term limits for justices of the Supreme Court.

Introduced Johnny Olszewski (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 174 proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would establish term limits for justices of the Supreme Court. This means that justices would serve for a fixed number of years rather than for life, potentially allowing for more frequent turnover in the Court's membership.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 174 argue that term limits would enhance the democratic process by ensuring that the Supreme Court reflects contemporary values and perspectives. They believe it would prevent justices from serving beyond their effective years and promote a more dynamic judiciary.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 174 claim that imposing term limits could undermine the independence of the judiciary and disrupt the continuity of legal precedent. They argue that life tenure is essential for justices to make impartial decisions without political pressure, and that term limits could lead to increased politicization of the Supreme Court.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The bill H.J.Res. 174, sponsored by Johnny Olszewski, proposes an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide for term limits for justices of the Supreme Court. An analysis of the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter reveals no direct industry overlaps. The top donor industries for the sponsor are Health Professionals and Retired individuals, contributing $120,000,000 and $37,500,000 respectively. The bill's subject matter, term limits for Supreme Court justices, does not directly impact these industries. Additionally, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not indicate a conflict of interest as none of the lobbying entities are among the sponsor's top donors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
BAE, KIM & LEE, LLC THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $370,000
MBK PARTNERS THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $150,000
B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC. POLSINELLI PC $70,000
VECTOR THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $40,000
SOLUTION PHILIPPINES, LLC THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $40,000
AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION $35,000
D-WAVE GOVERNMENT, INC THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RSVP PROGRAM DIRECTORS THE SUSQUEHANNA GROUP $5,000
STR8 CORPORATION BRODY GROUP L.L.C. PUBLIC AFFAIRS undisclosed
WEST GULF MARITIME ASSOCIATION WEST GULF MARITIME ASSOCIATION undisclosed
CENTRAL ADMIXTURE PHARMACY SERVICES, INC. POLSINELLI PC undisclosed
CARTRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed
BLUE DIAMOND ATOMICS NATURAL STATE CONSULTING AND STRATEGIES undisclosed
POPLICUS INCORPORATED DBA GOVINI CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed
STRYDENT AUTONOMOUS TECHNOLOGIES POTOMAC STRATEGIC CONSULTING LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Johnny Olszewski, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us