H.J.Res. 182

H.J.Res. 182: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to “Bulletin 2023-01: Unfair Billin

Introduced Janelle Bynum (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 182 is a joint resolution that allows Congress to disapprove a rule issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) regarding the withdrawal of a previous rule known as 'Bulletin 2023-01: Unfair Billing.' Essentially, this bill seeks to prevent the CFPB from retracting the protections laid out in that bulletin, which likely addresses unfair billing practices affecting consumers.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 182 argue that maintaining the rules outlined in Bulletin 2023-01 is crucial for protecting consumers from unfair billing practices. They highlight that the resolution reinforces the government's commitment to consumer rights and financial fairness.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 182 contend that the resolution undermines the CFPB's ability to adjust regulations based on current market conditions. They argue that it could lead to unnecessary regulatory burdens on businesses and stifle innovation in the financial sector, potentially harming consumers in the long run.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.J.Res. 182, sponsored by Janelle Bynum, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This suggests that the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal, as the financial interests of the donors do not appear to directly align with the legislative intent of the bill, which pertains to consumer financial protection regulations. Additionally, while there is some lobbying activity in the policy area, the lack of disclosed amounts and the absence of direct connections to the sponsor's donors further mitigates any perceived risk. Voters should be aware that while lobbying is present, it does not seem to influence the sponsor's legislative actions significantly in this case.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
DIRSHU INTERNATIONAL MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION $100,000
CEO WORKS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $45,000
KAZI IG SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $15,000
SOUTHERN FOLGER CONTRACTING BBT STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
WATERFRONT GLOBAL BBT STRATEGIES LLC $5,200
DIGITALEUROPE VIVID STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
DR. STEPHEN SOLOWAY MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ONE ISRAEL FUND MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HEMOGLOBIN OXYGEN THERAPEUTICS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ATAOLLAH AMINPOUR MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HERSEL NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MORAD BEN NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MARK SCOTT MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
BORIS MINTS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Janelle Bynum, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us