H.J.Res. 183

H.J.Res. 183: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to “Consumer Financial Protection C

Introduced Janelle Bynum (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 183 is a resolution that allows Congress to disapprove a rule from the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) that pertains to the withdrawal of a previous rule related to consumer financial protection. Essentially, it seeks to reverse the CFPB's decision to eliminate certain consumer protections.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 183 argue that reinstating the consumer protection rule is essential for safeguarding consumers from unfair financial practices and ensuring greater transparency in the financial sector. They emphasize that the resolution reflects a commitment to protecting vulnerable consumers and holding financial institutions accountable.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 183 contend that the resolution undermines the CFPB's authority and could lead to increased regulatory burdens on financial institutions. They argue that repealing the withdrawal of the rule may stifle innovation in the financial services industry and could ultimately harm consumers by limiting access to financial products.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.J.Res. 183 shows no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Janelle Bynum's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, which pertains to consumer financial protection regulations. This lack of overlap suggests that the financial interests of her donors are not directly influencing the legislative agenda in this instance. However, there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, with various organizations and individuals, such as DIRSHU INTERNATIONAL contributing $100,000 through MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION. While this indicates active interest in the legislative process, the absence of direct financial ties to the bill's subject mitigates potential conflict concerns. Voters should be aware that while lobbying is present, it does not necessarily translate to conflicts of interest without direct financial connections to the bill's provisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
DIRSHU INTERNATIONAL MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION $100,000
CEO WORKS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $45,000
KAZI IG SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $15,000
SOUTHERN FOLGER CONTRACTING BBT STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
WATERFRONT GLOBAL BBT STRATEGIES LLC $5,200
DIGITALEUROPE VIVID STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
DR. STEPHEN SOLOWAY MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ONE ISRAEL FUND MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HEMOGLOBIN OXYGEN THERAPEUTICS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ATAOLLAH AMINPOUR MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HERSEL NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MORAD BEN NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MARK SCOTT MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
BORIS MINTS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Janelle Bynum, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us