H.R. 10745 is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on October 5, 2026, by Representative Mary E. Miller (R-IL). The bill aims to prevent the removal of children from their parents or guardians based on the parents' refusal to consent to 'sex-rejecting interventions' for their children. While the full text of the bill is not yet available, the title suggests it seeks to protect parental rights in decisions regarding medical or psychological treatments related to a child's gender identity. The bill has been referred to the House Committees on Education and Workforce, Judiciary, and Ways and Means for further consideration.
Supporters of H.R. 10745 argue that the bill is essential for safeguarding parental rights and ensuring that parents have the authority to make medical decisions for their children without the threat of losing custody. They contend that 'sex-rejecting interventions' can have significant and irreversible effects on minors, and parents should have the right to decline such treatments without facing legal repercussions. Proponents believe the bill reinforces the importance of family autonomy and protects children from potentially harmful medical procedures.
Critics of H.R. 10745 express concern that the bill could prevent children experiencing gender dysphoria from accessing necessary medical care. They argue that denying 'sex-rejecting interventions' may lead to increased mental health issues, including depression and anxiety, among transgender youth. Opponents also worry that the bill could undermine the authority of child protective services to intervene in cases where denying medical treatment is deemed harmful to the child's well-being. They emphasize the importance of evidence-based medical care and the rights of children to receive appropriate treatments for gender-related issues.
The analysis of H.R. 10745, sponsored by Mary Miller, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The primary donor industry is Health Professionals, contributing a substantial $720 million, but this does not directly relate to the bill's focus on preventing the removal of children for sex-rejecting interventions. The second major donor category is Retired individuals, who contributed $225 million, which also lacks a direct connection to the bill's content. Given the absence of overlapping interests, the risk of conflicts of interest appears low. Voters should be aware that while significant funding exists from health professionals, it does not indicate a direct influence on the legislative intent of this bill.
Top industries funding Mary Miller, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
