H.R. 4986

H.R. 4986: Parents Opt-in Protection Act

Reported by Committee Mary Miller (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Parents Opt-in Protection Act (H.R. 4986) is a proposed law that would require schools to get written permission from parents or adult students before giving surveys that ask about personal topics like sex, mental health, illegal behavior, religion, or family relationships. This means that students would only take part in these surveys if their parents or they themselves (if they are adults) agree in writing.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the bill, such as the American Principles Project, argue that it protects family privacy and increases parental involvement in education. They believe that parents should have a say in whether their children participate in surveys on sensitive topics, and that this law would prevent government overreach into family matters.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill point out that requiring written consent could lead to fewer students participating in important surveys, making it harder for schools to identify and address issues like drug use or mental health problems. They also note that this requirement could create more paperwork for schools and reduce the effectiveness of public health efforts aimed at helping students.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 4986: Parents Opt-in Protection Act, sponsored by Mary Miller, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes various entities, but the disclosed amounts primarily come from healthcare and refrigerant-related industries. Notably, the Marshfield Clinic Health System contributed $60,000, which may indicate a vested interest in healthcare-related provisions, but there is no clear link to the specific provisions of the bill. The total lobbying amounts from the healthcare sector and refrigerant industry do not directly correlate with the bill's focus on parental rights and opt-in policies, suggesting a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION $150,000
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM $60,000
SOUTHERN IONICS KEY IMPACT STRATEGIES $30,000
COALITION FOR THE USE OF SAFE AND EFFICIENT REFRIGERANTS WILLIAMSON LAW + POLICY PLLC $20,000
NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION $5,000
HEALING LODGE OF THE SEVEN NATIONS HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
TIGERSWAN ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
LWRC INTERNATIONAL, LLC ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIVE VILLAGE OF EYAK HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION undisclosed
RMS OF GEORGIA, LLC D/B/A CHOICE REFRIGERANTS WILLIAMSON LAW + POLICY PLLC undisclosed
BRISTOL BAY AREA HEALTH CORP HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
COUNCIL OF ATHABASCAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us