H.R. 8507

H.R. 8507: To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to include as a high-priority research and extension initiative research and extension on precision agriculture workforce development, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mike Flood (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8507 is a bill that proposes amendments to the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. The primary focus of the amendment is to designate research and extension initiatives related to precision agriculture workforce development as high-priority. This suggests an emphasis on advancing education, training, and resources in precision agriculture, which involves the use of technology to improve farming efficiency and productivity.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8507 argue that the bill addresses a critical need for modernizing agricultural practices through technology. By prioritizing workforce development in precision agriculture, the bill is seen as a step towards equipping the agricultural sector with skilled professionals who can leverage technological advancements to enhance productivity and sustainability. Proponents highlight the potential for economic growth and improved food security as a result of these initiatives.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8507 may express concerns about the allocation of resources and funding towards precision agriculture initiatives. Some may argue that the focus on technology could overshadow other important areas of agriculture that require attention and investment. Additionally, there may be skepticism about whether the workforce development efforts will adequately address the diverse needs of rural communities, or if they might disproportionately benefit larger agricultural enterprises at the expense of smaller farms.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

Based on the available data, there appears to be a low risk of conflict of interest between the sponsor's donors and the bill's subject matter. There are no direct industry overlaps detected between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This means that the sponsor, Mike Flood, has not received significant campaign contributions from industries that would directly benefit from the bill. Furthermore, the lobbying activity related to this bill's policy area does not indicate any significant financial ties to the sponsor. The highest lobbying amounts are from BAE, Kim & Lee, LLC and MBK Partners, with $370,000 and $150,000 respectively, but these do not appear to be directly related to the sponsor or the bill's subject matter. It is important for voters to know that while lobbying activity can influence legislative outcomes, in this case, there is no clear evidence of a conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
BAE, KIM & LEE, LLC THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $370,000
MBK PARTNERS THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $150,000
B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC. POLSINELLI PC $70,000
VECTOR THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $40,000
SOLUTION PHILIPPINES, LLC THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $40,000
AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION $35,000
D-WAVE GOVERNMENT, INC THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RSVP PROGRAM DIRECTORS THE SUSQUEHANNA GROUP $5,000
ROWAN UNIVERSITY ROWAN UNIVERSITY undisclosed
STR8 CORPORATION BRODY GROUP L.L.C. PUBLIC AFFAIRS undisclosed
WEST GULF MARITIME ASSOCIATION WEST GULF MARITIME ASSOCIATION undisclosed
CENTRAL ADMIXTURE PHARMACY SERVICES, INC. POLSINELLI PC undisclosed
CARTRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed
BLUE DIAMOND ATOMICS NATURAL STATE CONSULTING AND STRATEGIES undisclosed
POPLICUS INCORPORATED DBA GOVINI CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mike Flood, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us