H.R. 8624

H.R. 8624: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a credit against employer payroll taxes for wages and other expenses paid or incurred for apprenticeship programs.

Introduced Nathaniel Moran (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8624 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to offer employers a tax credit against their payroll taxes. This credit would apply to wages and other expenses incurred for apprenticeship programs, encouraging businesses to invest in workforce training and development.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8624 have praised the bill for promoting job training and apprenticeship programs, arguing that it will enhance workforce skills and reduce unemployment. Many see it as a vital step toward strengthening the economy by equipping workers with necessary skills.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8624 express concerns that the bill could disproportionately benefit larger companies while leaving smaller businesses at a disadvantage. Some argue that the tax credit may not effectively lead to increased apprenticeship opportunities and could result in lost tax revenue.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 8624, which aims to provide a credit against employer payroll taxes for apprenticeship programs, shows no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Nathaniel Moran's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes contributions from various organizations, such as the National Association of State Aviation Officials ($30,000) and Zero to Three ($60,000), but these do not indicate a direct financial interest in apprenticeship programs. The absence of significant donor influence in this area suggests that the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal. Voters should be aware that while there is lobbying activity, it does not appear to directly impact the bill's intent or the sponsor's motivations.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ZERO TO THREE ACTUM I, LLC $60,000
SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $34,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AVIATION OFFICIALS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AVIATION OFFICIALS $30,000
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION RICH FEUER ANDERSON $30,000
EARLY EDGE CALIFORNIA ACTUM I, LLC $20,000
POWERUS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $17,500
ALABAMA FAMILIES FOR GREAT SCHOOLS BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR FAMILY CHILD CARE ACTUM I, LLC $10,000
MID-TIER ADVOCACY WASHINGTON PREMIER GROUP undisclosed
SPECIALTY MATERIALS, INC STRATEGIC MARKETING INNOVATIONS undisclosed
SENECA NATION SPIRIT ROCK CONSULTING undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS undisclosed
ALLIANCE FOR MEDICARE THE PICARD GROUP, LLC undisclosed
GULF PORTS ASSN PAT YOUNGER undisclosed
FUTURE DEFENSE USA, INC. DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Nathaniel Moran, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us