H.R. 8631

H.R. 8631: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that low alcohol by volume kombucha is exempt from any excise taxes and any regulations under chapter 53 of such Code which are imposed on alcoholic beverages.

Introduced Andrea Salinas (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8631 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to exempt low alcohol by volume kombucha from excise taxes and regulations that apply to alcoholic beverages. This means that kombucha with low alcohol content would not be treated like other alcoholic drinks in terms of taxation and regulatory oversight.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8631 argue that the bill promotes the growth of the kombucha industry by reducing financial burdens on small producers and encouraging the consumption of healthier beverage options. Advocates highlight the potential for increased market access and innovation within the non-alcoholic beverage sector.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8631 express concerns that exempting low alcohol kombucha from excise taxes could undermine public health initiatives aimed at regulating alcoholic beverages. There are fears that this could lead to confusion among consumers regarding the alcoholic content of kombucha and potentially increase underage consumption.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

There appears to be a low risk of conflict of interest in the case of H.R. 8631, a bill sponsored by Andrea Salinas. The bill's focus is on amending the Internal Revenue Code to exempt low alcohol by volume kombucha from excise taxes and certain regulations. However, the top donor industries for Salinas are Health Professionals and the Retired, with no direct overlap detected between these industries and the subject of the bill. Furthermore, the lobbying activity related to this bill's policy area does not involve any of Salinas's top donors. The largest lobbying expenditures come from various Native American tribes and the Napa Valley Vintners Association, none of which are directly linked to Salinas's campaign financing. Therefore, based on the available data, there is no clear money trail or potential conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $65,000
FEDERATED INDIANS OF THE GRATON RANCHERIA PACE, LLP $60,000
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA PACE, LLP $60,000
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
QUAPAW NATION PACE, LLP $50,000
CA STATE ASSEMBLY PACE, LLP $50,000
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI PACE, LLP $40,000
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS PACE, LLP $35,000
PENOBSCOT NATION PACE, LLP $30,000
COLUSA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $30,000
KARUK TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
NAPA VALLEY VINTNERS ASSOCIATION PACE, LLP $20,000
BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
WEST LOS ANGELES VETERANS' COLLECTIVE PACE, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Andrea Salinas, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us