H.R. 8644

H.R. 8644: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow deductions with respect to certain expenses relating to private planes.

Introduced Eugene Vindman (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8644 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by prohibiting tax deductions for certain expenses associated with the use of private planes. This means that individuals or businesses will no longer be able to deduct costs related to private aviation for tax purposes.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8644 argue that the bill promotes tax fairness by preventing wealthy individuals and corporations from benefiting from tax deductions on luxury expenses, which could help to reduce income inequality and ensure that tax resources are allocated more equitably.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8644 contend that the bill could negatively impact the aviation industry and small businesses that rely on private planes for operations. They argue that the legislation may disproportionately affect those who use private aviation for legitimate business purposes, potentially leading to job losses and reduced economic activity in related sectors.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$105,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The bill H.R. 8644, sponsored by Eugene Vindman, seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to disallow deductions related to certain expenses of private planes. The sponsor's top donor industries are Health Professionals and Retirees, with donations of $80,000,000 and $25,000,000 respectively. There is no direct overlap between these industries and the subject matter of the bill, which pertains to private plane expenses. Therefore, there is no apparent conflict of interest between the sponsor's donors and the bill's subject matter. Lobbying activity in the bill's policy area is significant, with various entities lobbying via PACE, LLP. However, none of these entities appear to be directly related to the sponsor's top donor industries or the bill's subject matter.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $65,000
FEDERATED INDIANS OF THE GRATON RANCHERIA PACE, LLP $60,000
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA PACE, LLP $60,000
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
QUAPAW NATION PACE, LLP $50,000
CA STATE ASSEMBLY PACE, LLP $50,000
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI PACE, LLP $40,000
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS PACE, LLP $35,000
PENOBSCOT NATION PACE, LLP $30,000
COLUSA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $30,000
KARUK TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
NAPA VALLEY VINTNERS ASSOCIATION PACE, LLP $20,000
BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
WEST LOS ANGELES VETERANS' COLLECTIVE PACE, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Eugene Vindman, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us