H.R. 9060

H.R. 9060: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that income received by a regulated investment company from precious metals shall be treated as qualifying income.

Introduced Kevin Hern (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9060 proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to classify income earned by regulated investment companies from investments in precious metals as qualifying income. This change aims to provide tax benefits and encourage investment in precious metals by these companies.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9060 highlight that the bill would enhance the investment landscape for regulated investment companies, potentially leading to increased investment in precious metals. This could diversify portfolios and offer more options for investors looking for stability in precious metals, which are often seen as a hedge against inflation.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9060 argue that the bill could lead to tax loopholes that favor certain investment companies over others, potentially undermining the integrity of the tax code. There are concerns that this could disproportionately benefit wealthy investors and create an uneven playing field in the investment market.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9060 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Kevin Hern's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter, which focuses on amending the Internal Revenue Code to treat income from precious metals as qualifying income for regulated investment companies. While there is significant lobbying activity in various sectors, including health and automotive innovation, none of these directly pertain to precious metals or regulated investment companies. The total lobbying contributions listed amount to $130,000, but they are spread across diverse industries that do not intersect with the bill's focus. This lack of direct connection suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest related to campaign contributions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ENVIRI ENVIRI $140,000
HART HEALTH STRATEGIES TIM YEHL, LLC $40,000
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION TIM YEHL, LLC $30,000
BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (FKA BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION) BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (FKA BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION) $30,000
FM LABS EQV STRATEGIC $15,000
BIG SKY SCIENTIFIC EQV STRATEGIC $15,000
CUBE RECOVERY COMPANY (DBA TEMPIQ) PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
THESEUS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
QUANTIFIND PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS INC. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
WINGXPAND PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
ANITOX EQV STRATEGIC $7,500
PROJECT LEGACY THE FRIEDLANDER GROUP undisclosed
THE FRIEDLANDER GROUP THE FRIEDLANDER GROUP undisclosed
THE PROJECT HONG KONG TRUST THE PROJECT HONG KONG TRUST undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Kevin Hern, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us