H.R. 8780

H.R. 8780: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand and improve the advanced manufacturing production tax credit.

Introduced Blake Moore (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8780 aims to modify the Internal Revenue Code to enhance the advanced manufacturing production tax credit. This likely involves increasing the amount of the tax credit available to manufacturers who invest in advanced technologies and processes, thereby encouraging growth and innovation in the manufacturing sector.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8780 have highlighted its potential to stimulate job creation in the manufacturing sector and promote technological advancements. Many see the expanded tax credit as a crucial step toward strengthening the U.S. economy and maintaining competitiveness in the global market.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8780 argue that expanding tax credits may lead to increased government spending without guaranteed benefits. Some express concern that the bill could disproportionately favor larger manufacturers, leaving smaller businesses at a disadvantage and potentially exacerbating economic inequality.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 8780 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Blake Moore's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, which focuses on expanding and improving the advanced manufacturing production tax credit. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes various organizations, but none of these appear to have a direct financial interest in advanced manufacturing as outlined in the bill. The largest lobbying contributions come from The GEO Group, Inc. ($80,000) and A.C.E. Consulting, which are not directly related to advanced manufacturing. Therefore, while there is lobbying activity, it does not indicate a significant conflict of interest given the lack of direct connections to the bill's subject matter.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
THE GEO GROUP, INC. CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $80,000
COPPER.CO SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $36,000
AMPL-ACTION FUND (FORMERLY ADVOCATES FOR MULTI-USE OF PUBLIC LANDS) BIGHORN PUBLIC AFFAIRS GROUP $20,000
USIG DIGITAL SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
USIG DIGITAL SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
PVS CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ARTPARK MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
MHG TELCO, LLL MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
ROSINA FOODS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $9,000
THE SALVATION ARMY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $6,000
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
THE GUTHRIE CLINIC BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Blake Moore, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us