H.R. 8798

H.R. 8798: To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 and the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to make breakfasts and lunches free for all children, and for other purposes.

Introduced Ilhan Omar (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8798 aims to amend existing child nutrition laws to provide free breakfast and lunch to all children in the United States. This legislation seeks to ensure that every child has access to nutritious meals during school hours, regardless of their family's income level.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8798 have praised the bill for its potential to combat child hunger and improve overall student health and academic performance. Many advocates argue that providing free meals can help alleviate financial burdens on families and promote equity in education.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8798 have raised concerns about the financial implications of providing free meals to all children, suggesting that it could lead to increased government spending and potential inefficiencies in the school meal program. Some argue that the focus should instead be on targeted assistance for low-income families rather than universal programs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$52,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the significant contributions from health professionals ($40,000,000) and retired individuals ($12,500,000) raise questions about potential indirect influences. The bill aims to provide free meals for children, which could intersect with health-related interests, particularly if those donors have stakes in nutrition or health services related to child welfare. Additionally, the lobbying activity in this area includes entities like USIG Digital, which has also contributed to the sponsor, indicating a potential conflict of interest where donor interests may align with legislative outcomes. Voters should be aware of these connections and consider how donor influence might affect policy decisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area. 2 lobbying client(s) are also sponsor donors.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
USIG DIGITAL Also a Donor SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
USIG DIGITAL Also a Donor SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
THE GEO GROUP, INC. CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $80,000
COPPER.CO SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $36,000
AMPL-ACTION FUND (FORMERLY ADVOCATES FOR MULTI-USE OF PUBLIC LANDS) BIGHORN PUBLIC AFFAIRS GROUP $20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
PVS CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ARTPARK MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
MHG TELCO, LLL MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
ROSINA FOODS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $9,000
THE SALVATION ARMY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $6,000
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
THE GUTHRIE CLINIC BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Ilhan Omar, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us