H.R. 8803

H.R. 8803: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a windfall profits excise tax on crude oil and to rebate the tax collected back to individual taxpayers until the President declares that all hostilities with Iran have ceased, the Strait of

Introduced Brad Sherman (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8803 proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code to introduce a windfall profits excise tax specifically on crude oil. The revenue generated from this tax would be rebated back to individual taxpayers. This rebate would continue until the President announces that all hostilities with Iran have ended.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 8803 as a necessary measure to address the rising costs of crude oil and provide financial relief to American taxpayers. Supporters argue that the bill could help redistribute profits from oil companies during times of geopolitical tension, ensuring that citizens benefit from the revenues generated during crises.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8803 have expressed concerns that imposing a windfall profits tax on crude oil could discourage investment in the energy sector and lead to higher prices at the pump. Some media reports highlight fears that this legislation may not effectively address the underlying issues of energy dependence and could instead complicate the economic landscape.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 8803, which proposes a windfall profits excise tax on crude oil, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the subject matter of the bill and the sponsor's top donor industries. This indicates a low likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from the sponsor's financial backers. The lobbying activity in this area is largely undisclosed, which complicates the assessment but does not directly indicate a financial interest in the bill's provisions. The largest disclosed lobbying amount is $600,000 from the National Electrical Contractors Association, which does not appear to have a direct stake in oil taxation or the implications of this bill. Therefore, the risk of conflicts of interest remains minimal.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. $600,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
ENVISION GROUP LLC MR. ANDREW FUTEY undisclosed
GESCONTI GROUP,INC. GESCONTI GROUP,INC. undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN LOGISTICS ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
TRACKONOMY SYSTEMS, INC. ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
HOLLY STRATEGIES INC. ON BEHALF OF 202 GROUP ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
CITY OF ST LOUIS BRACY TUCKER BROWN & VALANZANO DBA BROWN & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
EMAD EL SAID YOUSSEF SAAD EL-GALADA THROUGH BOLT CAPITAL, LP NEXUSONE CONSULTING undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Brad Sherman, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us