H.R. 8825 aims to prohibit the deployment of military troops at polling places during elections. The bill seeks to ensure that the electoral process remains free from military influence and is conducted in a peaceful environment.
H.R. 8825 was introduced in the 119th Congress by April McClain Delaney (Democrat) and is currently listed as “Introduced”. It is classified under the Government Operations and Politics policy area, one of 364 bills in that area we track this Congress.
April McClain Delaney is the sponsor of 5 bills in our database this Congress, so H.R. 8825 is part of a broader legislative agenda rather than a one-off proposal.
FEC records show April McClain Delaney received $37.5 million from industries this bill affects, led by Retired.
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 8825 5/10 (moderate risk), higher than 92% of analyzed bills; the average in Government Operations and Politics is 3/10.
Supporters of H.R. 8825 have praised the bill as a necessary measure to protect the integrity of the democratic process. They argue that keeping military personnel away from polling places helps to promote a safe and non-intimidating environment for voters, thereby encouraging higher voter turnout.
Critics of H.R. 8825 have expressed concerns that the bill may undermine public safety and security during elections. Some argue that the presence of military personnel can deter potential violence and ensure order, and that prohibiting troops at polling places may leave voters vulnerable to intimidation or unrest.
The bill H.R. 8825, which seeks to prohibit troops at the polls, presents a medium risk for conflicts of interest due to the financial connections between the sponsor, April McClain Delaney, and the retired industry. Delaney has received a total of $37,500,000 from retired individuals, which aligns with the Government Operations and Politics sector that could be affected by this legislation. This overlap raises concerns about whether the interests of her donors may influence her stance on this bill. While the health professionals' contributions are significant, they do not directly relate to the bill's subject matter, reducing the overall risk. However, the substantial amount from the retired sector warrants attention as it could indicate a potential bias in favor of policies that align with their interests.
These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.
| Industry | Match Type | Related Subject | Donations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retired (W06) | Sector | Government Operations and Politics | $37,500,000 |
| Total from overlapping industries | $37,500,000 | ||
Top industries funding April McClain Delaney, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
What does H.R. 8825 do?
H.R. 8825 aims to prohibit the deployment of military troops at polling places during elections. The bill seeks to ensure that the electoral process remains free from military influence and is conducted in a peaceful environment.
Has H.R. 8825 received a floor vote?
No roll-call vote on H.R. 8825 is recorded in our database yet. Its current status is “Introduced”.
Who funds the sponsor of H.R. 8825?
FEC records show April McClain Delaney received $37.5 million from industries this bill affects, led by Retired. Overlap does not imply wrongdoing; it shows where financial interests and legislation intersect.
Does H.R. 8825 have a conflict of interest?
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 8825 5/10 (moderate risk), higher than 92% of analyzed bills; the average in Government Operations and Politics is 3/10. This score reflects overlap between the sponsor’s campaign funding, lobbying activity, and the industries the bill affects. It is a transparency indicator, not an accusation.
What is the status of H.R. 8825?
H.R. 8825 is currently “Introduced” as of our last update on May 19, 2026.
Who sponsored H.R. 8825?
H.R. 8825 was sponsored by April McClain Delaney (Democrat).
