H.R. 8853

H.R. 8853: To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow Amtrak to use grant funds to satisfy non-Federal share requirements of certain grant programs, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jennifer McClellan (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8853 is a bill that amends federal law to permit Amtrak to utilize grant funds to meet the non-Federal matching requirements of specific grant programs. This change aims to enhance Amtrak's ability to secure funding for its operations and projects.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8853 have praised the bill for potentially increasing Amtrak's financial flexibility and enabling the rail service to access more federal funding. Advocates argue that this will improve rail infrastructure and services, ultimately benefiting passengers and communities reliant on Amtrak.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8853 have expressed concerns that allowing Amtrak to use grant funds for non-Federal share requirements could lead to misuse of funds or diminish accountability. Some detractors argue that this could divert money from other essential transportation projects or undermine the competitive balance in grant allocations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 8853, which aims to amend grant fund usage for Amtrak, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Jennifer McClellan's top donor industries. While there is significant lobbying activity in the transportation sector, particularly from entities like VERDEGO AERO, which contributed $200,000, these contributions do not directly correlate with the bill's focus on Amtrak funding. The lack of direct financial ties between the sponsor's donors and the bill's provisions indicates a lower risk of conflicts of interest. However, the substantial lobbying amounts suggest that stakeholders in the transportation sector are actively seeking influence, which voters should be aware of.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
REFORMING AMERICA'S TAXES EQUITABLY (RATE) SURROUND SOUND STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC undisclosed
ADNEURIS THERAPEUTICS, INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
ALUCHEM INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
GPA MIDSTREAM ASSOCIATION SHUMAKER ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed
INDUSTRIOUS GROUP INC. THORN RUN PARTNERS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jennifer McClellan, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us