H.R. 9012

H.R. 9012: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow 5-year carrybacks for the low-income housing tax credit.

Introduced Mike Carey (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9012 is a bill that seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 5-year carryback for the low-income housing tax credit. This means that taxpayers who qualify for this credit would be able to apply any unused portion of the credit to their tax liability from the previous five years, potentially providing them with a refund or reducing their tax burden for those years.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9012 argue that allowing a 5-year carryback for the low-income housing tax credit would encourage investment in affordable housing. They believe it could provide much-needed financial relief to developers and investors who contribute to low-income housing projects, ultimately benefiting communities by increasing the availability of affordable housing options.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9012 express concern that the bill may lead to a significant loss of tax revenue for the federal government, which could impact funding for other essential services. Some also argue that the carryback provision may primarily benefit larger developers rather than directly aiding low-income individuals in need of housing assistance.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9012, which seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code to allow 5-year carrybacks for the low-income housing tax credit, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Mike Carey's top donor industries. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes various organizations, but none are directly tied to the low-income housing sector. The total contributions from the identified lobbying groups amount to $160,000, but these funds do not indicate a direct financial interest in the bill's provisions. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest appears minimal, as there are no apparent financial incentives for the sponsor that would compromise the integrity of the legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ZERO TO THREE ACTUM I, LLC $60,000
SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $34,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AVIATION OFFICIALS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AVIATION OFFICIALS $30,000
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION RICH FEUER ANDERSON $30,000
EARLY EDGE CALIFORNIA ACTUM I, LLC $20,000
POWERUS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $17,500
ALABAMA FAMILIES FOR GREAT SCHOOLS BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR FAMILY CHILD CARE ACTUM I, LLC $10,000
MID-TIER ADVOCACY WASHINGTON PREMIER GROUP undisclosed
SPECIALTY MATERIALS, INC STRATEGIC MARKETING INNOVATIONS undisclosed
SENECA NATION SPIRIT ROCK CONSULTING undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS undisclosed
ALLIANCE FOR MEDICARE THE PICARD GROUP, LLC undisclosed
GULF PORTS ASSN PAT YOUNGER undisclosed
FUTURE DEFENSE USA, INC. DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mike Carey, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us