H.R. 9056

H.R. 9056: To direct the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to allow certain recipients of the Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant, and other grants, to be used for the payment of premiums for a community-based, parametric flood insur

Introduced Andrew Garbarino (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9056 directs the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to permit certain recipients of the Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant, as well as other related grants, to use these funds to pay for premiums associated with community-based parametric flood insurance. This type of insurance is designed to provide quick financial assistance based on predetermined parameters related to flooding events.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9056 have praised the bill for promoting innovative flood insurance solutions that can enhance community resilience against flooding. They argue that using grant funding for parametric insurance premiums will help communities recover faster after flood events and reduce the financial burden on local governments.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9056 have raised concerns that allowing grant funds to be used for insurance premiums could divert resources away from direct flood mitigation projects. Some argue that this approach may not adequately address the root causes of flooding and could lead to complacency in implementing necessary infrastructure improvements.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9056 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Andrew Garbarino's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning flood mitigation assistance grants. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the contributions from entities such as Summit Works USA ($20,000) and Monroe Energy, LLC ($10,000) do not indicate a direct financial interest in the specifics of the bill. The lack of direct financial ties suggests that the risk of conflicts of interest is minimal. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not necessarily translate into conflicts, especially when no overlapping interests are identified.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
SUMMIT WORKS USA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Andrew Garbarino, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us