H.R. 9105

H.R. 9105: To reinstate criminal penalties for persons charging veterans unauthorized fees relating to claims for benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

Introduced Chris Pappas (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9105 aims to reinstate criminal penalties for individuals who charge veterans unauthorized fees for assistance with claims for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs. This legislation seeks to protect veterans from exploitation and ensure that they receive the benefits they are entitled to without incurring unnecessary costs.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9105 have praised the bill as a necessary step to safeguard veterans from fraudulent practices. Media outlets highlight the importance of protecting those who have served the country and ensuring that they are not taken advantage of by unscrupulous individuals seeking to profit from their claims for benefits.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9105 argue that reinstating criminal penalties may create an overly punitive environment for those who assist veterans. Some media reports express concern that this could discourage legitimate assistance efforts and create barriers for veterans seeking help with their claims, potentially complicating the benefits process.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9105, which focuses on reinstating criminal penalties for unauthorized fees charged to veterans. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in the legislation, which is aimed at protecting veterans from exploitation. The lobbying activity related to this bill shows significant contributions from various entities, including Hart Health Strategies ($40,000) and the Brain Injury Association of America ($30,000), but these do not directly correlate with the bill's focus on veterans' benefits. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal, as the financial support does not suggest an agenda that would influence the legislation negatively for veterans.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ENVIRI ENVIRI $140,000
HART HEALTH STRATEGIES TIM YEHL, LLC $40,000
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION TIM YEHL, LLC $30,000
BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (FKA BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION) BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (FKA BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION) $30,000
FM LABS EQV STRATEGIC $15,000
BIG SKY SCIENTIFIC EQV STRATEGIC $15,000
CUBE RECOVERY COMPANY (DBA TEMPIQ) PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
THESEUS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
QUANTIFIND PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS INC. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
WINGXPAND PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
ANITOX EQV STRATEGIC $7,500
PROJECT LEGACY THE FRIEDLANDER GROUP undisclosed
THE FRIEDLANDER GROUP THE FRIEDLANDER GROUP undisclosed
THE PROJECT HONG KONG TRUST THE PROJECT HONG KONG TRUST undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Chris Pappas, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us