H.R. 9481

H.R. 9481: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve responses by the Internal Revenue Service to claims for refund, and for other purposes.

Introduced Deborah Ross (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9481 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to enhance the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) processes for handling claims for tax refunds. This bill likely includes measures to streamline and improve the efficiency and responsiveness of the IRS when taxpayers file for refunds.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9481 have praised the bill for addressing long-standing issues within the IRS's handling of refund claims. They argue that improving the efficiency of the refund process will benefit taxpayers, reduce wait times, and enhance overall taxpayer satisfaction with the IRS.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9481 express concerns that while the intention to improve IRS responses is commendable, the bill may not adequately address the underlying systemic issues within the agency. Some also worry about the potential for increased bureaucracy or unintended consequences that could complicate the refund process further.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$630,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9481 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Deborah Ross's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, which focuses on improving IRS responses to claims for refund. The top donor industries, primarily health professionals and retirees, do not have a clear connection to tax refund processes or IRS operations. The total contributions from these industries amount to $630 million, but without a direct link to the bill, the risk of conflict is minimal. Additionally, the lobbying activity in this policy area does not align with the interests of Ross's top donors, further reducing potential conflicts. Voters should be aware that while large donations exist, they do not appear to influence this specific legislative effort significantly.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION ACTION INC ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
COMCAST CORPORATION THEGROUP DC, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC $40,000
CLEAN FUELS ALLIANCE AMERICA (FORMERLY REPORTED AS NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD) BRACEWELL LLP $40,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION BRICK STREET STRATEGY $20,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Deborah Ross, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $480,000,000
Individuals: $480,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $150,000,000
Individuals: $150,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us