H.R. 9523

H.R. 9523: To permit judicial review of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) claims.

Introduced Seth Moulton (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9523 aims to allow individuals with Temporary Protected Status (TPS) to have their claims reviewed by the judicial system. This means that TPS recipients would have the opportunity to challenge decisions regarding their status in court, potentially providing them with greater legal protections and avenues for recourse.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9523 argue that the bill enhances the legal rights of TPS recipients, ensuring that they have access to fair judicial processes. Advocates believe that this legislation is a step towards protecting vulnerable populations who have sought refuge in the U.S. from countries experiencing crises.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9523 express concerns that allowing judicial review of TPS claims could lead to increased legal challenges and burdens on the immigration system. Some argue that it may complicate the process for TPS recipients and could be exploited by individuals seeking to prolong their stay in the U.S. without a valid basis.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.R. 9523, which pertains to judicial review of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) claims, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor, Seth Moulton's, top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area shows contributions from various entities, including Occidental Petroleum Corporation ($20,000) and Peabody Energy Corporation ($50,000), but these industries do not have a direct connection to immigration or TPS claims. Given the lack of direct financial ties to the bill's subject, the risk of conflict of interest remains low. However, voters should remain vigilant about potential indirect influences from lobbyists in related fields.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA BUTLER SNOW LLP $12,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Seth Moulton, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us