H.R. 9623

H.R. 9623: Protecting Americans’ Health Care Act of 2026

Introduced Brendan Boyle (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Protecting Americans’ Health Care Act of 2026 (H.R. 9623) aims to repeal specific Medicaid-related provisions from a previously enacted law, Public Law 119-21. By doing so, it seeks to restore Medicaid policies to their state prior to the enactment of those provisions. The bill does not introduce new Medicaid programs or rules but focuses on reversing earlier changes.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9623 argue that the bill is a necessary step to correct overreaching Medicaid provisions introduced in Public Law 119-21. They believe that by repealing these provisions, the bill will restore Medicaid to a more sustainable and effective framework, ensuring better allocation of resources and improved care for beneficiaries.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill contend that repealing the Medicaid-related provisions of Public Law 119-21 could lead to reduced coverage and benefits for vulnerable populations. They express concern that such a rollback might reverse progress made in expanding access to healthcare services, potentially leaving many without necessary medical support.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
8/10
Risk Level
High
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The Protecting Americans’ Health Care Act of 2026, sponsored by Brendan Boyle, presents significant potential conflicts of interest due to the substantial financial contributions from the health professionals sector. With $120 million donated from health professionals, who are directly affected by health care legislation, there is a clear financial incentive for the sponsor to align the bill's provisions with the interests of these donors. This creates a risk that the legislation may favor the health professionals' interests over broader public health needs. Additionally, while the retired sector has contributed $37.5 million, it does not directly correlate with the bill's subject matter, making the health professionals' donations the primary concern for potential bias in legislative outcomes.

Industry Overlap — Follow the Money

These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.

Industry Match Type Related Subject Donations
Health Professionals (H01) Sector Health $120,000,000
Total from overlapping industries $120,000,000
Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
INTERNATIONAL PAPER INTERNATIONAL PAPER $310,000
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY $180,000
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPERATING LLC ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $80,000
ABDESLAM JAIDI MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. $80,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION $75,000
RENT-A-CENTER THE ROYER LAW FIRM (FORMERLY ROYER & BROOKS) $30,000
CITRUS COUNTY ALCALDE & FAY $20,000
MONUMENT STRATEGIES, LLC THE ROYER LAW FIRM (FORMERLY ROYER & BROOKS) $20,000
PYXUS INTERNATIONAL, INC. THE ROYER LAW FIRM (FORMERLY ROYER & BROOKS) $15,000
LIGHTSOLVER, LTD (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC EJK, LLC $10,000
WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY EJK, LLC $10,000
NACHA, THE ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS ASSOCIATION NACHA, THE ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS ASSOCIATION undisclosed
ALI AZEMI F/B/O UNION ASSOCIATION OF IMK EX-STEEL PIPE FACTORY EMPLOYEES SOMERTONS, PLLC undisclosed
TECHNOLOGY COUNCILS OF NORTH AMERICA TECHNOLOGY COUNCILS OF NORTH AMERICA undisclosed
TRADE EXCHANGE OF AMERICA THE ROYER LAW FIRM (FORMERLY ROYER & BROOKS) undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Brendan Boyle, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us