H.R. 9709

H.R. 9709: To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to adjust the applicability of the income related monthly adjustment amount to premiums under part B of Medicare.

Introduced Thomas Kean (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9709 proposes changes to the income-related monthly adjustment amount (IRMAA) that affects how premiums for Medicare Part B are calculated based on an individual's income. This adjustment aims to modify the current system to potentially lessen the financial burden on certain Medicare beneficiaries by altering the income thresholds or the calculation method for these premiums.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9709 argue that the bill is a necessary step towards making healthcare more affordable for seniors. They highlight that adjusting the income thresholds for Medicare Part B premiums could provide financial relief to many beneficiaries who are currently facing high costs due to rising healthcare expenses.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9709 express concerns that altering the income-related adjustment could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased costs for the Medicare program overall. Some argue that it may create disparities among beneficiaries and could undermine the program's sustainability by shifting the financial burden.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 9709, which seeks to amend Medicare's income-related monthly adjustment amounts, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Thomas Kean's top donor industries. The absence of overlapping interests indicates a lower likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from campaign contributions. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes significant contributions from various organizations, such as $410,042 and $377,725 from Saildrone Inc., but these do not directly connect to the bill's subject matter concerning Medicare adjustments. Therefore, while there is considerable lobbying activity, it does not appear to create a direct conflict with the sponsor's financial backers. Voters should be aware that while lobbying is present, the lack of direct donor overlap suggests a lower risk of conflicts.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $410,042
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $377,725
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. $158,589
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION $150,000
SBIR CONSORTIUM JOHN WILLIAMS $30,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS $30,000
SEEING MACHINES GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
CREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC $30,000
MIDDLE EAST FORUM MIDDLE EAST FORUM $20,000
SHEA'S O'CONNELL PRESERVATION GUILD LTD. D/B/A SHEA'S PERFORMING ARTS CENTER MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
END SEPSIS CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
TECHNEST SOLUTIONS S.L.A. DBA FORTRIS ON BEHALF OF NEXUSONE CONSULTING CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
HAITELMEX FOUNDATION, INC HAITELMEX FOUNDATION, INC undisclosed
SBCC EQUIPMENT DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Thomas Kean, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $480,000,000
Individuals: $480,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $150,000,000
Individuals: $150,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us