H.R. 9713

H.R. 9713: To remove the United States from the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank Group, or the Asian Development Bank if such an institution assists in providing debt relief to the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.

Introduced Scott Perry (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9713 proposes to withdraw the United States from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank Group, or the Asian Development Bank if any of these institutions provide debt relief to China. The bill aims to prevent U.S. funds and support from being used to assist China financially in situations where they are receiving debt relief.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised the bill as a strong stance against China, arguing that it protects U.S. taxpayer dollars and promotes accountability in international financial institutions. Supporters believe that the legislation reinforces U.S. sovereignty and discourages countries from relying on financial assistance from the U.S. while benefiting adversarial nations.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill have expressed concerns that it could isolate the U.S. from important international financial discussions and cooperation. Some argue that the legislation could undermine global financial stability and harm developing countries that rely on these institutions for support. Additionally, there are worries that it may escalate tensions with China rather than fostering constructive engagement.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
International Affairs

The analysis of H.R. 9713, sponsored by Scott Perry, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This suggests a lower likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from financial contributions influencing the legislative process. The bill aims to withdraw the U.S. from international financial institutions if they provide debt relief to China, a matter that does not appear to directly intersect with the interests of Perry's top donors. Given that there are no significant financial ties to industries that would be impacted by this legislation, the risk of undue influence is minimal. Voters should be aware that while the absence of overlap reduces the risk of conflicts, it does not eliminate the potential for indirect influences or broader political motivations.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Scott Perry, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us