H.R. 9716

H.R. 9716: To prohibit Federal law enforcement agencies from using or accessing State or local surveillance equipment or data to circumvent warrant requirements, to establish a Jurisdictional Wall List of covered technologies, and for other purposes.

Introduced Keith Self (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9716 aims to prevent federal law enforcement agencies from using or accessing surveillance equipment or data from state or local authorities in order to bypass warrant requirements. The bill also proposes the creation of a Jurisdictional Wall List that would identify specific technologies covered by these restrictions.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9716 argue that the bill strengthens privacy protections for individuals by ensuring that federal law enforcement cannot sidestep legal warrant requirements through state or local resources. Advocates believe this legislation is a crucial step in safeguarding civil liberties and promoting transparency in surveillance practices.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9716 express concerns that the bill may hinder federal law enforcement's ability to effectively combat crime and terrorism. They argue that limiting access to state and local surveillance tools could compromise public safety and create challenges in law enforcement coordination across jurisdictions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Crime and Law Enforcement

The analysis of H.R. 9716, sponsored by Keith Self, indicates no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This suggests that the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal, as the bill aims to restrict federal access to state or local surveillance technologies, which does not align with the interests of the industries that financially support the sponsor. Without significant financial ties to surveillance technology firms or related industries, the risk of undue influence is low. Voters should be aware that while campaign contributions can sometimes create perceived conflicts, in this case, the absence of relevant donor connections mitigates those concerns.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Keith Self, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us