H.R. 9765

H.R. 9765: To amend the requirements for teaching residency programs under part A of title II of the Higher Education Act of 1965.

Introduced Adam Smith (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9765 is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 16, 2026, by Representative Adam Smith. The bill aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to modify the requirements for teaching residency programs. Teaching residency programs are school-based teacher preparation programs where prospective teachers work alongside experienced mentor teachers while completing their coursework. The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce for further consideration.

Positive Media Summary

As of now, there is limited media coverage on H.R. 9765. However, similar past initiatives to enhance teaching residency programs have been positively received. For instance, the 'Teacher, Principal, and Leader Residency Access Act' introduced in 2024 highlighted the effectiveness of such programs in recruiting diverse candidates and improving teacher retention rates. These programs are seen as a strategic approach to address teacher shortages, especially in high-need areas.

Negative Media Summary

Currently, there is no specific negative media coverage on H.R. 9765. In general, critiques of teaching residency programs have focused on concerns about the scalability and funding of such initiatives. Some argue that while residency programs are beneficial, they require significant resources and may not be feasible for all educational institutions to implement effectively.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 9765, which aims to amend the requirements for teaching residency programs under the Higher Education Act, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Adam Smith's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area shows significant contributions from various organizations, notably the American College of Emergency Physicians, which contributed $498,299. However, this organization does not directly relate to the educational focus of the bill. The absence of direct connections between the bill's objectives and the financial interests of the donors suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not appear to influence the educational reforms proposed in this legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS $498,299
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND $150,000
COLLIER COLLECTIVE, LLC MCCOLL STRATEGIES LLC $40,000
HART HEALTH STRATEGIES TIM YEHL, LLC $40,000
PANO AI PANO AI $40,000
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION TIM YEHL, LLC $30,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
PSEG SERVICES CORPORATION TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
COUNTY OF NAPA PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
LAKE COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NEVADA COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
HUMBOLDT COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATORS PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
NATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
CLARK COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Adam Smith, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us