H.Res. 1374

H.Res. 1374: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that parents should be provided clear, accurate, and useful information about the content of video programming so they can make informed decisions for their children.

Introduced Harriet Hageman (R) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1374 expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that parents should receive clear and accurate information about video programming content. This aims to help parents make informed decisions regarding what their children watch.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.Res. 1374 argue that the resolution empowers parents by promoting transparency in video programming. They believe that with better information, parents can protect their children from inappropriate content, fostering a safer viewing environment.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.Res. 1374 contend that the resolution may lead to unnecessary censorship or restrictions on creative expression in video programming. They argue that it places too much responsibility on content creators and could undermine parental discretion and the diverse choices available to families.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Science, Technology, Communications

The bill H.Res. 1374 aims to provide parents with clear information about video programming for children. The sponsor, Harriet Hageman, has significant donations from the health professionals sector, totaling $120 million, and from retired individuals, amounting to $37.5 million. However, there are no direct overlaps between the subject matter of the bill and the industries of her top donors, indicating that the financial interests of her donors are unlikely to influence the legislation. The lobbying activity in this area also does not suggest any direct financial ties to the bill's content, as most lobbying efforts are undisclosed or not directly related to video programming content. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest appears minimal.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $140,000
QUECTEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $90,000
CONNECTIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS MCDERMOTT+ LLC $60,000
CAMBER HEALTH MCDERMOTT+ LLC $50,000
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WINEGRAPE GROWERS TORREY ADVISORY GROUP (FORMERLY MICHAEL TORREY ASSOCIATES, LLC) $50,000
BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES $20,000
PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC $20,000
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA - NUWEH MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
GREENPOWER BX LLC MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
CLARITY MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
ABRAWORKS LIMITED BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC undisclosed
THE PARTNERSHIP TO ADVANCE VIRTUAL CARE (PAVC) MCDERMOTT+ LLC undisclosed
MBDA INCORPORATED MBDA INCORPORATED undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Harriet Hageman, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us