H.Res. 1399

H.Res. 1399: Directing the Committee on Ethics to preserve and publicly release records relating to monetary settlements involving acts of sexual harassment.

Agreed To (Simple Resolution) Thomas Massie (R) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1399 is a resolution that directs the Committee on Ethics to preserve and publicly release records related to monetary settlements that involve acts of sexual harassment. This aims to increase transparency regarding how sexual harassment cases are handled and resolved within the U.S. legislative context.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have highlighted this resolution as a significant step toward accountability and transparency in Congress. Supporters argue that making these records public will help to shed light on the prevalence of sexual harassment and promote a safer workplace environment for all employees.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.Res. 1399 have raised concerns about the potential for misuse of the released information, arguing that it could infringe on privacy rights and discourage victims from coming forward. Some also fear that the focus on monetary settlements may overshadow the need for systemic changes to address harassment.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
5/10
Risk Level
Medium
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Congress

The bill H.Res. 1399, which directs the Committee on Ethics to preserve and publicly release records relating to monetary settlements involving acts of sexual harassment, is sponsored by Thomas Massie, who has received significant contributions from the 'Retired' industry, totaling $75,000,000. This presents a potential conflict of interest as the bill addresses ethical standards that could impact individuals within this donor category. While the primary focus of the bill is on transparency regarding sexual harassment settlements, the financial backing from this industry raises questions about whether the sponsor may prioritize the interests of his donors over the ethical implications of the legislation.

Additionally, the absence of contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs) in the sponsor's top donor industries suggests that the influence may be more direct and personal, potentially increasing the risk of bias in legislative decisions. Voters should be aware that while the bill aims to enhance accountability, the financial ties to the 'Retired' sector could complicate the motivations behind the sponsor's support for this measure.

Industry Overlap — Follow the Money

These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.

Industry Match Type Related Subject Donations
Retired (W06) Sector Congress $75,000,000
Total from overlapping industries $75,000,000
Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Thomas Massie, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us
Congressional Votes
On the Resolution
House · Jun 30, 2026
Passed
420
YEA
0
NAY
11
NOT VOTING

Source: GovTrack.us roll call vote data.